Safety on roads, bridges, and public walkways depends on reliable anti-skid surfacing. When choosing between Bimagrip vs Thorgrip, you need a solution that suits your environment, traffic levels, and budget. Both products are widely used in marine and civil engineering sectors, providing strong anti-slip surfaces for areas exposed to motor vehicles, foot traffic, and heavy traffic. But which one is best for your project?
Understanding Bimagrip and Thorgrip
Both Bimagrip and Thorgrip technology are designed to improve safety by reducing stopping distances and preventing skidding. These anti-skid solutions are commonly applied to bridges, public walkways, and high-traffic areas where slip resistance is essential. However, their application methods, longevity, and cost-effectiveness differ.
Thorgrip: A Versatile Surfacing Solution
Thorgrip is a cost-effective surfacing solution used in both marine and civil engineering projects. It consists of a polyurethane primer and selected aggregate, forming a durable anti-slip surface.
There are two main types:
- Thorgrip HD – Designed for heavy traffic, including lorries and buses.
- Thorgrip STS – Ideal for public walkways and areas with less traffic.
Thorgrip provides quick turnarounds, making it perfect for projects with busy transport schedules. It bonds well to concrete, steel, and existing surfaces, ensuring strong adhesion and a long-lasting finish. This helps avoid disruption, as surfaces can be reopened to traffic in a limited time.
Bimagrip: A Globally Recognised Solution
Bimagrip is a globally recognised anti-skid surfacing product widely used in civil engineering sectors. It incorporates a high-strength polyurethane primer and durable aggregate to create a long-lasting surface that withstands motor vehicles and extreme weather.
Compared to Thorgrip, Bimagrip requires re-application less frequently, making it a cost-effective option over time. It is well-suited for areas where safety is a major threat, such as sharp bends, steep inclines, and bridges.
Comparing Costs and Efficiency
When considering alternative products, cheaper alternatives may seem appealing, but they often require frequent maintenance. Thorgrip provides a cost-effective and efficient solution for projects needing quick turnarounds. However, Bimagrip may offer better durability, reducing the need for resurfacing in the future.
The aggregate required for both solutions varies. Thorgrip uses a selected aggregate to create high anti-slip performance, while Bimagrip relies on long-lasting materials that resist wear from foot traffic and motor vehicles.
Choosing the Right Solution for Your Project
- If you need a cost-effective solution for limited time projects with heavy traffic, Thorgrip is a strong option.
- If you prioritise long-lasting performance and want to minimise future maintenance costs, Bimagrip is worth considering.
- If your project involves marine environments or steel surfaces, Thorgrip technology offers excellent adhesion and anti-slip properties.
Final Thoughts
Both Bimagrip and Thorgrip have a vast experience in the industry, providing high-performance anti-skid surfaces for civil engineering and marine applications. Your choice depends on the traffic, surface type, and need for quick turnarounds or long-lasting durability. If you require expert advice, Thortech can help you find the right surfacing solution to suit your needs.
